What these rules produce in the end stands as a finished table on the home page; who runs the site and how it is financed, in about this site. Both belong to a method — a rule of calculation without a sender is only an assertion with numbers in it.
Five addresses stand in this comparison without a score, because their cashier was not opened here: Bitcasino.io, BitStarz, Chipstars, LeeBet and JacksClub. Three zeros read like a verdict although all they mean is that nobody looked — so these entries stand with what is on the record, and without a rank.
The five inputs and their weights
Twelve points, divided up| Input | Points | How it is counted |
|---|---|---|
| Settlement coins in the cashier | 3 | Twelve coins and more = 3, nine to eleven = 2, six to eight = 1, fewer = 0. What is counted stands in the cashier itself, not in the pitch on the front page. |
| Bitcoin itself | 2 | BTC in the cashier = 2, otherwise 0. On a site named after bitcoin that is not a formality but the first question. |
| A value-stable counterpart | 2 | USDT, USDC or DAI in the cashier = 2, otherwise 0. Without such a coin the balance sits in the exchange rate between two sittings. |
| Verification clause with a figure | 3 | The terms name an amount or a deadline = 3. A clause that is there but carries no figure = 1. Nothing read = 0. |
| Licence in the register | 2 | Number found and status readable = 2. Number without a readable status = 1. Not findable or revoked = 0. |
The sum is twelve. Three inputs come out of the cashier, one out of the terms, one out of the licence issuer's register.
Why the cashier weighs so heavily
Seven of twelve pointsThree of the five inputs describe the cashier: how many settlement coins stand in it, whether bitcoin itself is among them, whether a value-stable counterpart sits beside it. Together that is seven of twelve points. The reason is the cut of this site: it compares cashiers and not ranges of games, and the cashier is the part that can be checked from outside without an account.
The fourth input — a verification clause with a figure — weighs three points on its own, as much as the whole length of the cashier. That is a deliberate decision: a long coin list does not help if the withdrawal hangs on a check whose moment nobody knows in advance. Which is exactly why the longest cashier read in this table does not sit in first place.
How a tie is resolved
The sharper record firstTwelve points across five inputs make a coarse grid, and ties are the normal case within it. They are resolved not by sympathy and not by the length of the cashier but by the sharpness of the record: an entry with a verification clause carrying a figure stands ahead of one whose clause names no number.
The reasoning is the same as for the weight of that input. A number in the terms can be checked and planned for in advance; a long coin list can only be counted. Only if that trait is equal too does the length of the cashier decide, and last the alphabet — never the order in which the entries were written.
Why unread cashiers get no rank
A zero would be a lieThe convenient solution would be to take in every address and put unread cashiers at the bottom with zero points. That would be wrong: zero settlement coins reads as «carries no coins», when what is meant is «nobody looked here». The difference is the one between an empty shelf and a room nobody has entered.
So 5 addresses stand in a list of their own, with what is on the record for them. For three of those, what is on the record is precisely the verification threshold written as a figure — the input that weighs heaviest in the calculation.
Who does not appear at all
One exclusion| Operator | Reason | Record |
|---|---|---|
| BC.Game | Status in the register: «Revoked» | OGL/2023/118/0060 |
A revoked certificate is not a poor rank but no rank at all. Status in the register: «Revoked», read on 26 August 2026.
What this calculation cannot do
Four limitsWhat it delivers
- It makes the order traceable: every input can be checked on its own
- It forces «not read» to be told apart from «not there»
- It prefers statements that stand outside the operator
- It can be recomputed with different weights — the weights stand above
What it does not deliver
- It says nothing about how long a withdrawal takes — a measurement is missing
- It says nothing about support in a dispute
- It does not check whether a register entry is substantively true, only that it is there
- It does not replace reading the terms before the first deposit
The weights are a decision made by this site and not a constant of nature. Anyone weighting the length of the cashier higher and the verification clause lower would get a different order — and could justify it with the same numbers. Which is why the weights stand up there and not in the small print.
Questions people actually type
Answered from the same records as the pageHow does the score come about?
From five inputs with fixed weights, twelve points in all. Three come out of the cashier, one out of the terms, one out of the register.
Why are not all operators in the table?
Because the table measures the cashier. An operator that was not read gets no rank — zero points would be a statement about the operator rather than about this site.
Can the order be challenged?
Yes, and with the same numbers: different weights give a different order. That is why the weights stand in full on this page.
Read next