What actually differs
Three traitsBetween two titles, essentially three things differ: the swing, the number and kind of bonus rounds, and the possible maximum win. Everything else — theme, graphics, music — is fitting-out. That is not a put-down: fitting-out is why somebody likes a title.
The swing is the trait with the largest consequences for the evening. A title with a high swing pays rarely and then larger; one with a low swing more often and smaller. At the same stake, the same balance feels completely different.
Why no returns stand here
No figure without a sourceA return figure circulates for every title, and it is passed from site to site without anybody saying where it came from. It is binding only where the maker states it, and then it applies to a particular build of the title, which a cashier may or may not carry.
Which is why no return without a source stands on this page. That is less convenient than a table of a hundred numbers and the only treatment that does the matter justice.
What the cashier has to do with it
Bonus weightingIn bonus conditions slots are almost always the best-weighted family: what is staked here usually counts in full towards the wagering. Accept a bonus and play slots anyway and you are not working against your own habit — unlike at the live table.
The sum for that stands on the wagering page, and it is why the question «which bonus is good» cannot be answered without the question «what do I play anyway».
What slots does to the payment route
Pace and feeThe network fee hangs on the space a transfer takes up and not on its size. For this family that means: A sitting with a steady stake per round plans well into a single deposit, and that is exactly the cheap variant in bitcoin. Fix the amount beforehand and you save yourself the top-ups, each of which costs a network fee again.
Think about that beforehand and you choose the route into the cashier differently from the route back out — and save at the only place where anything can be saved while playing at all. The sum stands on the fees page, the routes in proportion on the networks page.
Slots and planning an evening
The widest choice, the smallest decisionEvery family demands a different kind of limit. With slots it is the swing of the chosen title: a title that pays rarely and then larger needs a different budget from one that pays often and small — at an identical stake.
Fix beforehand
- The stake per round, before the first title is opened
- An amount in francs for the whole sitting
- Whether a bonus is accepted — before the first stake, not after
- How long the sitting lasts, whatever the balance
Do not decide while playing
- Whether the amount goes up «one more time» — that is the decision which cancels a limit
- Whether the sitting is extended because the balance is just now good or just now bad
- Whether a bonus is accepted after all, with its conditions unread
- Whether to top up because the deposit is «already on its way anyway»
That sounds obvious and is the place where the family actually makes a difference: a limit in francs holds in every family, a limit in rounds holds only where a round lasts roughly the same. More on that on the measured play page.
What stands on this page describes the family and not a particular title. Return figures stand only where a source comes with them, and systems or predictions appear for no family.
Questions people actually type
Answered from the same records as the pageWhat distinguishes two slots?
The swing, the bonus rounds and the possible maximum win. Theme and graphics are fitting-out.
Why are there no return figures here?
Because a return is binding only where the maker states it — and then for a particular build of the title. Without a source, no figure stands here.
Do slots count in full towards a bonus?
Usually yes; in bonus conditions they are normally the best-weighted family. What applies stands in the bonus rules of the cashier concerned.
Read next